Bridge Failures: Major Collapses, Causes, and Lessons

Bridge failures occur when a bridge, one of its spans, or a critical structural component can no longer perform as intended. In some cases, the result is a complete collapse. In others, the failure may involve a partial deck loss, a fractured support, severe deformation, or damage serious enough to force closure, demolition, or major reconstruction.

This chronological list focuses on historically significant bridge failures rather than every instance of minor deterioration or localized damage. It includes collapses during construction, failures caused by design or material defects, deterioration, overloading, floods, scour, earthquakes, fires, vehicle impacts, vessel collisions, and other events that compromised structural safety. Priority is given to incidents that caused deaths or injuries, disrupted major transportation routes, exposed weaknesses in engineering or inspection practices, or led to meaningful changes in bridge design, maintenance, regulation, or emergency response.

The cases are organized by historical period, beginning before 1800 and continuing through the present day. Each section highlights notable failures in the United States and around the world, with key details such as location, date, cause, casualties, and safety impact. Later sections compare the deadliest U.S. incidents, explain the most common causes of bridge collapse, and show how past disasters reshaped modern bridge safety.

Bridge Failures Before 1800

Before the Industrial Revolution, bridges were built largely from timber, stone, and simple masonry systems whose performance depended heavily on local craftsmanship and experience. Formal structural analysis, standardized materials, and systematic inspection did not yet exist. As a result, early bridge failures were often triggered by floods, fire, severe weather, military movement, or crowds that exceeded what a structure could safely carry. Surviving records are incomplete, so this list emphasizes well-documented failures that illustrate the principal risks of preindustrial bridge construction rather than attempting a comprehensive catalog.

Medieval timber bridge damaged by floodwater before the Industrial Revolution.
Early timber and masonry bridges were especially vulnerable to floods, fire, crowd loading, and limited structural knowledge.
DateBridge and LocationPrimary CauseDeaths and Significance
October 28, 312Milvian Bridge temporary crossing
Rome, Roman Empire
Wooden pontoon bridge used during the Battle of the Milvian Bridge
The temporary crossing failed as Maxentius’s retreating troops attempted to cross the TiberCasualties are unknown; the crossing became unusable
October 17, 1091London Bridge
London, England
Wooden bridge across the Thames
A powerful tornado struck London and destroyed or severely damaged the bridgeCasualties are unknown; the bridge required reconstruction
1136London Bridge
London, England
Rebuilt timber crossing
Fire destroyed the wooden bridge, demonstrating the vulnerability of early urban crossings to flames spreading through densely built areasCasualties are not reliably documented; the bridge was rebuilt
1275Sint Servaasbrug
Maastricht, Holy Roman Empire
Wooden bridge carrying a large religious procession
The structure collapsed under the concentrated weight of the crowdHistorical accounts report about 400 deaths; the bridge became unusable
February 2, 1342Judith Bridge
Prague, Kingdom of Bohemia
Medieval stone arch bridge
A severe flood damaged or destroyed much of the structureCasualties are unknown; roughly two-thirds of the bridge collapsed or was heavily damaged
1444Rialto Bridge
Venice, Venetian Republic
Wooden bridge with a central drawbridge
Spectators crowded the bridge to watch a wedding procession, overloading the structureThe bridge collapsed; the number of casualties is uncertain
October 25, 1499Pont Notre-Dame
Paris, France
Wooden bridge lined with houses and shops
The bridge collapsed during flooding after carrying substantial building loads and suffering deteriorationThe bridge and its structures were lost; casualty figures are uncertain

These events show why early bridge safety depended as much on controlling crowds, fire, and river conditions as on the bridge itself. Timber crossings could be rebuilt quickly but were highly vulnerable to weather and flames, while stone bridges offered greater durability yet remained exposed to floods and foundation damage. Because many accounts were recorded long after the events, casualty totals and exact failure mechanisms should be treated as historical estimates rather than modern investigative findings.

Bridge Failures from 1800 to 1899

The 19th century transformed bridge construction. Railroads demanded longer spans and heavier load capacity, while builders adopted cast iron, wrought iron, suspension systems, and increasingly ambitious truss designs. These advances expanded transportation networks but also exposed weaknesses in material quality, structural analysis, construction control, and maintenance. Several disasters occurred when new bridge types were placed in service before engineers fully understood their behavior under moving trains, wind, vibration, flooding, or concentrated crowds.

Nineteenth-century iron railroad bridge carrying a steam train during severe weather.
Railroad expansion tested early cast-iron and wrought-iron bridges under heavier loads, vibration, wind, and flooding.
DateBridge and LocationPrimary CauseDeaths and Significance
September 20, 1807Eitai Bridge, Edo—present-day Tokyo, Japan
Wooden beam bridge over the Sumida River
Festival crowds overloaded the bridge, causing a pier and two spans to failHistorical estimates range from 500 to 2,000 deaths, making it one of the century’s deadliest bridge failures
March 29, 1809Ponte das Barcas, Porto, Portugal
Wooden pontoon bridge across the Douro River
Thousands of civilians and soldiers crowded onto the bridge while fleeing French forces during the First Battle of PortoSeveral spans failed; deaths are often estimated at approximately 4,000
December 6, 1825Saale Bridge, Nienburg, Germany
Chain-supported bridge with a small movable section
Poor materials, uneven loading, and vibration from a large gathering contributed to failureFifty-five people reportedly drowned or died from exposure
April 12, 1831Broughton Suspension Bridge, England
Suspension bridge used by pedestrians and troops
A bolt failed while soldiers marched in step, producing synchronized loading and vibrationOne end collapsed and 20 people were injured; British troops were later instructed to break step on bridges
May 2, 1845Yarmouth Suspension Bridge, England
Pedestrian suspension bridge
Spectators shifted toward one side while watching a river performance, overloading the suspension systemSeventy-nine people drowned, many of them children
May 24, 1847Dee Bridge, Chester, England
Cast-iron railroad bridge
A passenger train loaded a structure weakened by a flawed design and brittle cast-iron componentsFive people were killed; the failure intensified concern about cast iron in railroad bridges
April 16, 1850Angers Bridge, France
Suspension bridge carrying French troops
Strong wind, corrosion, and the dynamic movement of soldiers contributed to the collapseApproximately 226 people were killed
May 17, 1854Wheeling Suspension Bridge, Virginia—now West Virginia
Long-span suspension bridge carrying the National Road
Wind produced severe vertical and torsional movement in the deckThe deck was destroyed, but the towers remained standing and no deaths were reported
November 1, 1855Gasconade Bridge, Missouri
Temporary wooden railroad trestle
An inaugural train entered the unfinished crossing before permanent supports had replaced temporary workThirty-one people were killed and many others injured
March 12, 1857Desjardins Canal Bridge, Canada
Railroad bridge near Hamilton, Ontario
A locomotive axle failure derailed the train as it approached or crossed the bridge, damaging the structureFifty-nine people were killed
June 27, 1859Springbrook Bridge, Indiana
Railroad embankment and bridge
Heavy rain washed out supporting earth and undermined the crossing before a passenger train arrivedAt least 41 people were killed; some historical accounts give higher totals
September 26, 1860Bull Bridge, Ambergate, England
Cast-iron railroad bridge
A cast-iron beam cracked and failed beneath a freight trainThe bridge collapsed completely, but no deaths or injuries were reported
June 11, 1861Wootton Bridge, England
Cast-iron railroad bridge
Cracked girders, flawed design, and an inadequate repair led to failure under a passing trainTwo people were killed
February 6, 1871New Hamburg Railroad Bridge, New York
Wooden trestle and drawbridge
A derailed train collision caused an explosion and fire that destroyed part of the bridgeTwenty-two people were killed
May 4, 1873Dixon Bridge, Illinois
Iron road bridge crowded with pedestrians
A large crowd gathered on one side to watch a baptism, exposing a serious design weaknessForty-six people were killed and 56 injured
May 5, 1875Portage Bridge, New York
Large wooden railroad bridge over the Genesee River
Fire spread through the timber structureThe bridge was destroyed, but no casualties were reported
December 29, 1876Ashtabula River Railroad Bridge, Ohio
Wrought-iron truss with cast-iron components
Deficient design, fabrication, inspection, and possible fatigue contributed to collapse beneath a passenger trainNinety-two people were killed and 64 injured; fire in the wreckage increased the losses
December 28, 1879Tay Rail Bridge, Scotland
Wrought-iron girder railroad bridge on cast-iron columns
Defective design and construction, deterioration, inadequate wind resistance, and a severe storm combined during a train crossingAbout 75 people were killed; the disaster changed expectations for wind loading and independent review
March 14, 1887Bussey Bridge, Boston, Massachusetts
Iron railroad bridge
Poor design, weak details, and inadequate maintenance caused the bridge to fail beneath a commuter trainTwenty-three people were killed and more than 100 injured
June 14, 1891Münchenstein Rail Bridge, Switzerland
Wrought-iron truss bridge
Structural weaknesses and earlier flood damage contributed to collapse beneath a heavily loaded passenger trainSeventy-one people were killed and 171 injured
May 26, 1896Point Ellice Bridge, Victoria, British Columbia
Iron road bridge carrying a streetcar
An overloaded streetcar entered a deteriorated span whose condition and capacity had not been adequately controlledAt least 47 people were killed; historical totals vary

Bridge Failures from 1900 to 1949

The first half of the 20th century brought wider use of structural steel, reinforced concrete, motor vehicles, and increasingly ambitious railroad and highway spans. Yet design calculations, material testing, construction oversight, and aerodynamic analysis were still developing. The failures below show how floods, weakened or overloaded structures, construction mistakes, vehicle and vessel impacts, and unfamiliar behavior in long-span bridges continued to cause major losses.

DateBridge and LocationPrimary CauseDeaths and Significance
August 7, 1904Dry Creek Bridge, near Eden, ColoradoA flash flood washed out the wooden railroad bridge before a passenger train reached the crossingThe train plunged into floodwater; 111 people were reported killed and the bridge was destroyed
January 20, 1905Egyptian Bridge, St. Petersburg, Russian EmpireThe suspension bridge failed while a cavalry unit and civilian traffic were crossing; the precise mechanism remains disputedNo deaths were reported; the structure was later rebuilt
April 15, 1905Portage Canal Swing Bridge, Houghton, MichiganThe steamer Northern Wave struck the movable steel spanThe swing span was severely damaged and rebuilt; no deaths were reported
September 18, 1906Cimarron River railroad bridge, Dover, Oklahoma TerritoryHigh water and accumulated debris swept away a temporary wooden trestleA passenger train entered the gap; reported deaths range widely, from four to more than 100
August 29, 1907Quebec Bridge, Quebec City, CanadaDesign and management failures allowed critical compression members to buckle while the steel cantilever bridge was under constructionSeventy-five workers were killed; the disaster prompted major changes in design review and project control
November 22, 1911Romanov Bridge, near present-day Zelenodolsk, RussiaMoving ice undermined construction scaffolding over the Volga RiverThirteen deaths were confirmed and many workers were reported missing
June 18, 1914Baddengorm Burn railway bridge, Carrbridge, ScotlandHeavy rain and debris from an upstream washout overwhelmed the crossingFive people drowned when a railcar fell into the burn
December 18, 1915Division Street Bridge, Spokane, WashingtonPoor-quality steel, fatigue, and earlier flood-related impact damage weakened the bridgeThe bridge and two streetcars were lost; five to seven people were killed
September 11, 1916Quebec Bridge, Quebec City, CanadaA jack-bearing failure caused the new center span to slip while it was being lifted into positionEleven workers were killed; the 5,000-ton span fell into the St. Lawrence River
August 2, 1920Grand Avenue Bridge, Neillsville, WisconsinRepeated heavy truck traffic was believed to have weakened the steel trussOne person was killed and the bridge was replaced with a concrete structure
June 18, 1921Greenfield Bridge, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaA deteriorated wooden bridge collapsed after it had already been closed to vehicles because of structural weaknessNo deaths were reported; the crossing was completely lost
July 22, 1926Fremantle Railway Bridge, Western AustraliaFlooding damaged the railway crossing over the Swan RiverNo casualties were reported; damaged portions required repair and load testing
November 22, 1927Bridge near Jalón, SpainThe structure failed while carrying a funeral processionAbout 100 people were thrown into the water; casualty totals are uncertain
December 14, 1928Kärevere Bridge, EstoniaInadequate cement content and design defects caused a newly accepted reinforced-concrete bridge to fail before openingNo one was killed; the bridge was completely destroyed
September 1, 1936Falling Creek Bridge, Chesterfield County, VirginiaA truck struck a tie rod, triggering the collapse of the wood-and-steel bridgeFour people were killed and five injured
January 27, 1938Honeymoon Bridge, Niagara Falls, United States–CanadaAn ice jam and river pressure displaced the steel arch bridge from its foundationsThe bridge was destroyed without reported fatalities and was later replaced by the Rainbow Bridge
August 31, 1939Sandö Bridge, SwedenThe main concrete arch span collapsed during constructionEighteen workers were killed; the rebuilt bridge opened in 1943
November 7, 1940Tacoma Narrows Bridge, WashingtonA narrow, flexible deck proved highly vulnerable to aerodynamic forces, leading to destructive torsional motion in strong windThe center span collapsed four months after opening. No people died, but the failure transformed suspension-bridge design and established wind-tunnel testing as a central tool for long-span bridges
December 12, 1940Theodor Heuss Bridge, Ludwigshafen, GermanyThe concrete road bridge collapsed during constructionThe structure was destroyed and completion of the Rhine crossing was delayed
July 28, 1942Chesapeake City Bridge, MarylandThe tanker Franz Klasen struck the supports of the vertical-lift spanThe central span collapsed and was later replaced by a high-level bridge
February 28, 1945Deutz Suspension Bridge, Cologne, GermanyThe damaged road bridge collapsed while repairs were underwayThe bridge was completely destroyed; the number of casualties is uncertain
March 17, 1945Ludendorff Bridge, Remagen, GermanyEarlier battle damage and demolition attempts left the railroad truss critically weakenedThe bridge collapsed ten days after its capture, killing 28 people and injuring 93
February 24, 1946John P. Grace Memorial Bridge, Charleston, South CarolinaThe freighter Nicaragua Victory struck the steel cantilever bridgeThree spans collapsed, five people were killed, and the damaged sections were replaced

The chronology and historical casualty figures are based on documented bridge-failure records, although totals for several early incidents vary among sources.

Tacoma Narrows Bridge deck twisting in strong wind before its 1940 collapse.
The Tacoma Narrows collapse transformed the aerodynamic design and wind testing of long-span suspension bridges.

Tacoma Narrows was especially influential because the bridge did not fail from excessive traffic, corrosion, or a conventional overload. Its slender, solid-girder deck interacted unfavorably with the wind, producing aeroelastic instability—motion sustained and amplified by aerodynamic forces. Investigations showed that long suspension bridges required greater torsional stiffness and deck shapes that allowed air to move around or through the structure. The collapse led to expanded wind-tunnel research and changed the design of later suspension bridges.

Across the period as a whole, the recurring lesson was that new materials alone did not guarantee safety. Reliable bridges also required accurate load assumptions, verified material quality, careful construction, protection against impacts and floods, and design methods suited to forces engineers had not previously measured well.

Bridge Failures from 1950 to 1999

Between 1950 and 1999, bridge construction expanded alongside interstate highways, urban expressways, high-speed rail, and global shipping. Steel and reinforced or prestressed concrete enabled longer, more efficient spans, but the period also exposed risks that earlier design and inspection practices did not always address. Failures increasingly involved fatigue, corrosion, construction falsework, vessel impacts, seismic forces, scour, and details with little structural redundancy.

DateBridge and LocationPrimary CauseDeaths and Significance
December 24, 1953Tangiwai railway bridge
Near Tangiwai, New Zealand
A volcanic lahar from Mount Ruapehu damaged a pier shortly before an overnight passenger train arrivedThe locomotive and several cars entered the Whangaehu River, killing 151 people. The disaster demonstrated the need for effective hazard monitoring and railway warning systems.
June 17, 1958Second Narrows Bridge
Vancouver, British Columbia
Temporary support work was unable to carry the load during construction of the steel cantilever bridgeNineteen people died, including a rescue diver. The inquiry identified errors in falsework calculations and inadequate checking of temporary works.
October 25, 1960Severn Railway Bridge
Gloucestershire, England
Two fuel barges collided in fog and struck a bridge pierTwo spans collapsed, five crew members died, and the damaged railway crossing was ultimately abandoned.
July 10, 1962Kings Bridge
Melbourne, Australia
Brittle fracture developed in welded steel girders because of unsuitable steel and fabrication-related weaknessesNo one died, but major cracking forced repairs and a Royal Commission review of steel selection, welding, and quality control.
June 16, 1964Lake Pontchartrain Causeway
Louisiana
A towboat pushing barges struck the bridge during poor visibilityA section fell into the lake and six motorists were killed, illustrating the vulnerability of low-level crossings to vessel impacts.
August 10, 1966Heron Road Bridge
Ottawa, Ontario
Falsework supporting fresh concrete failed during constructionNine workers were killed and more than 50 injured. The collapse became a major Canadian case involving temporary works, construction sequencing, and site oversight.
December 15, 1967Silver Bridge
Point Pleasant, West Virginia–Kanauga, Ohio
A small fatigue crack in a single eyebar grew until the fracture triggered a rapid chain collapse in the nonredundant suspension systemForty-six people died. The investigation intensified nationwide concern about aging bridges and helped drive stronger federal inspection requirements.
November 6, 1967Queen Juliana Bridge
Willemstad, Curaçao
A large portion of the steel bridge collapsed while it was being erectedFifteen workers died. Construction was later restarted, and a redesigned bridge opened in 1974.
June 2, 1970Cleddau Bridge
Pembrokeshire, Wales
A steel box-girder cantilever failed during erection because of an inadequate support diaphragm and serious organizational shortcomingsFour workers died and five were injured. The disaster contributed to an international reassessment of box-girder design and erection procedures.
October 15, 1970West Gate Bridge
Melbourne, Australia
Attempts to correct a difference in camber between box-girder sections introduced severe stresses before a span failedA 367-foot section collapsed during construction, killing 35 workers and injuring 18. The Royal Commission prompted stricter design and erection controls.
November 10, 1971South Bridge
Koblenz, West Germany
A steel box-girder section buckled and fell into the Rhine during constructionThirteen workers were killed, adding to concerns about the design and erection of large steel box-girder bridges.
November 7, 1972Sidney Lanier Bridge
Brunswick, Georgia
The freighter African Neptune struck the bridge, causing part of the roadway to collapseTen people were killed. The replacement bridge was designed with greater clearance and protection for marine traffic.
January 5, 1975Tasman Bridge
Hobart, Tasmania
The bulk carrier Lake Illawarra struck bridge piers in the Derwent RiverTwo spans and part of the roadway collapsed. Twelve people died, including motorists and ship crew members, and eastern Hobart lost its main road connection.
August 1, 1976Reichsbrücke
Vienna, Austria
Long-term deterioration and failure around a pier and bearing system caused a major span to collapseOne motorist died. The Danube crossing was replaced rather than repaired.
February 13, 1979Hood Canal Floating Bridge
Washington
A severe storm subjected the floating bridge to waves and pontoon floodingThe western half sank without fatalities. The replacement incorporated revised design and operating provisions for severe weather.
January 18, 1980Almö Bridge
Near Tjörn, Sweden
The bulk carrier Star Clipper struck the bridge’s main arch in darknessThe central span collapsed and eight motorists drove into the gap before traffic could be stopped.
May 9, 1980Sunshine Skyway Bridge
Tampa Bay, Florida
The bulk carrier Summit Venture struck a support pier during a sudden storm with restricted visibilityAbout 1,297 feet of bridge fell into the bay and 35 people died. The replacement included protective dolphins and improved vessel-collision safeguards.
July 17, 1981Hyatt Regency walkways
Kansas City, Missouri
A connection redesign doubled the load on critical hanger-rod box-beam connections, which lacked adequate capacityTwo suspended interior walkways—not a highway or railroad bridge—collapsed, killing 114 people and injuring more than 200. The case became a defining lesson in design review and engineering responsibility.
April 15, 1982Cline Avenue bridge ramp
East Chicago, Indiana
Falsework and its supporting concrete pads failed during a concrete placement operationFourteen construction workers ultimately died and others were injured. Investigators identified deficient temporary-work design, components, and documentation.
June 28, 1983Mianus River Bridge
Greenwich, Connecticut
Corrosion and an undetected displacement in a pin-and-hanger assembly allowed a suspended span to lose supportA 100-foot section of Interstate 95 fell into the river, killing three people and seriously injuring three.
April 5, 1987Schoharie Creek Bridge
Near Amsterdam, New York
Floodwater and scour—erosion of soil around a foundation—undermined a pierMultiple New York State Thruway spans collapsed and 10 people died. The investigation emphasized underwater inspection and evaluation of scour vulnerability.
April 1, 1989Hatchie River Bridge
Near Covington, Tennessee
Deteriorated piles and river conditions contributed to the collapse of supporting column bentsThree spans fell, sending five vehicles into the river and killing eight people. The case reinforced concerns about underwater components and inspection follow-through.
October 17, 1989Cypress Street Viaduct
Oakland, California
The Loma Prieta earthquake overwhelmed vulnerable reinforced-concrete columns and connections in the double-deck freewayAbout 0.7 mile collapsed, killing 42 people. The failure accelerated seismic evaluation and retrofit programs for California bridges.
October 17, 1989San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge
California
The Loma Prieta earthquake caused a 50-foot upper-deck section to fall onto the lower deckOne motorist died. The crossing closed for approximately one month while the damaged section was repaired.
November 25, 1990Lacey V. Murrow Memorial Bridge
Seattle, Washington
During renovation, wastewater and stormwater entered the hollow concrete pontoons, causing progressive floodingMuch of the floating bridge sank, although no one was killed. The failure exposed serious weaknesses in construction planning, risk control, and project oversight.
September 22, 1993Big Bayou Canot railroad bridge
Near Mobile, Alabama
Barges pushed by the towboat Mauvilla struck and displaced the movable bridge in dense fog; an Amtrak train arrived minutes laterThe train derailed, killing 47 people and injuring 103. The accident revealed failures in navigation, bridge protection, communication, and emergency response.
October 21, 1994Seongsu Bridge
Seoul, South Korea
Poor welding, fatigue cracking, corrosion, and inadequate inspection weakened a critical steel connectionA 157-foot span fell into the Han River during morning traffic, killing 32 people and injuring 17.
March 10, 1995Interstate 5 bridges over Arroyo Pasajero
California
Flooding produced severe scour around bridge foundationsTwo bridges failed and seven people died. The event reinforced federal efforts to identify and manage scour-critical bridges.
September 27, 1996Koror–Babeldaob Bridge
Palau
The prestressed-concrete box-girder bridge collapsed after years of excessive deflection and shortly after strengthening workTwo people died, and the loss of the crossing disrupted water, power, and transportation services between the islands.
June 3, 1998Road overpass at Eschede
Lower Saxony, Germany
A high-speed train derailed after a wheel failure, struck the overpass supports, and brought the bridge down onto following carsThe overall rail disaster killed 101 people. Here, bridge collapse was a consequence of the derailment rather than the initiating structural failure.
July 6, 1998Injaka Bridge
Mpumalanga, South Africa
The concrete bridge collapsed during incremental launching after temporary construction and design-related failuresFourteen people died and 19 were injured, many of them workers standing on the unfinished deck.
January 4, 1999Qijiang Rainbow Bridge
Chongqing, China
Defective construction, poor welding, inadequate materials, and corruption-related oversight failures weakened the pedestrian bridgeThe structure collapsed into the river, killing 40 people and injuring others.
Silver Bridge with a close-up of the fractured eyebar connection associated with the 1967 collapse.
The Silver Bridge failure exposed the danger of fracture-critical components without an alternate load path.

This period marked a shift from isolated structural lessons to organized bridge-safety programs. U.S. investigations increasingly focused on fracture-critical details, underwater foundations, seismic vulnerability, construction-stage controls, and the consequences of vessel impacts. The findings helped expand inspection practices and showed that maintenance, temporary works, navigation risks, and emergency response must be treated as integral parts of bridge safety.

Bridge Failures from 2000 to 2020

Bridge failures in the first two decades of the 21st century were documented with more detailed forensic analysis than most earlier disasters. Investigators could examine digital design records, surveillance footage, inspection histories, material samples, vehicle data, and construction sequences. The resulting findings show that collapses rarely stemmed from a single isolated defect. Many involved a triggering event—such as flooding, fire, overload, or impact—combined with inadequate capacity, deterioration, weak temporary works, or failures in inspection and decision-making.

DateBridge and LocationPrimary CauseDeaths and Significance
May 20, 2000Charlotte Motor Speedway pedestrian bridge, North CarolinaA concrete beam fractured as spectators left a race; design and reinforcement deficiencies reduced the span’s capacityThe bridge fell onto U.S. Route 29, injuring 107 people.
December 13, 2000Hoan Bridge, Milwaukee, WisconsinHighly concentrated stresses around welded details caused bracing members to fracture and the deck to buckleNo one was killed, but the damaged span was demolished and rebuilt, while similar details elsewhere were reviewed.
March 4, 2001Hintze Ribeiro Bridge, PortugalFlooding and long-term riverbed erosion undermined a pier foundation, with sand extraction contributing to scourThe central span collapsed beneath a bus and cars, killing 59 people.
September 15, 2001Queen Isabella Causeway, TexasBarges left the navigation channel and struck a supporting pierThree sections collapsed and eight motorists died after vehicles entered the opening. Texas later installed a bridge-collapse warning system.
May 26, 2002I-40 Bridge, near Webbers Falls, OklahomaA towboat captain lost consciousness, allowing barges to strike a pierA 600-foot section collapsed. Fourteen people died because approaching drivers could not detect the missing roadway in time.
July 21, 2003Kinzua Bridge, PennsylvaniaA tornado subjected the historic steel viaduct to forces beyond its capacity; deteriorated anchor bolts contributed to tower failuresEleven towers collapsed. No deaths occurred, and the bridge was preserved as a ruin rather than rebuilt.
March 26, 2004I-95 Howard Avenue overpass, Bridgeport, ConnecticutA tanker crash produced an intense fire that weakened the steel superstructureSouthbound spans collapsed without fatalities; temporary lanes opened within days.
September 30, 2006De la Concorde overpass, Laval, QuebecDeficient reinforcement detailing, construction practices, inspection, and concrete behavior contributed to a punching-shear failureThe overpass collapsed onto the highway below, killing five people and injuring six.
December 2006Bhagalpur pedestrian overbridge, IndiaA 150-year-old bridge being dismantled collapsed onto a passing passenger trainMore than 30 people were killed, demonstrating the risks posed by demolition work conducted beside active transportation routes.
June 15, 2007Jiujiang Bridge, Guangdong, ChinaA vessel struck a pier of the highway bridgePart of the bridge fell into the river, killing eight people.
August 1, 2007I-35W Mississippi River Bridge, Minneapolis, MinnesotaUndersized gusset plates had inadequate capacity under added bridge weight, traffic, and concentrated construction loadsThirteen people died and 145 were injured. The investigation prompted nationwide attention to gusset plates and construction loading.
August 13, 2007Tuo River Bridge, Fenghuang, ChinaThe masonry arch bridge collapsed during construction as workers removed scaffolding; poor materials and deficient project control were identifiedSixty-four workers died and 22 were injured.
September 26, 2007Cần Thơ Bridge approach, VietnamUneven settlement of a temporary support foundation caused the falsework and partially completed approach spans to failFifty-five workers died and dozens were injured in one of Vietnam’s worst construction disasters.
August 8, 2008Road bridge at Studénka, Czech RepublicA bridge under reconstruction fell onto an active railroad immediately before a passenger train arrivedThe train struck the debris at high speed, killing eight people and injuring about 70.
August 21, 2009Broadmeadow railway viaduct, IrelandTidal scour undermined a masonry pier until a span collapsedNo one was injured because a train had crossed shortly beforehand and the line was subsequently protected.
December 25, 2009Kota Chambal Bridge, IndiaTemporary works failed while the cable-stayed bridge was under constructionForty-eight workers were killed. Investigations highlighted serious deficiencies in construction planning, execution, and oversight.
November 26, 2011Kutai Kartanegara Bridge, IndonesiaA suspension-system component failed while maintenance work was underway; deterioration and hanger condition were among the concernsThe deck fell into the Mahakam River, killing at least 20 people and injuring dozens.
August 24, 2012Yangmingtan Bridge ramp, Harbin, ChinaSeveral heavily loaded trucks occupied the same ramp section; overloading and construction quality were investigatedA 100-meter section overturned, killing three people and injuring five.
May 23, 2013I-5 Skagit River Bridge, WashingtonAn oversized load struck overhead truss members, compromising a nonredundant spanOne span collapsed and vehicles fell into the river. Three people were injured, but no one died.
April 12, 2014Acaraguá Bridge, Misiones, ArgentinaA deteriorated highway bridge failed while carrying a passenger busThree people were killed and 30 injured.
June 10, 2014Cable Bridge interchange, Surat, IndiaA curved concrete span failed during removal of construction staging because of a design deficiencyTen workers were killed and six injured; the design was modified before completion.
January 10, 2016Nipigon River Bridge, OntarioA tie-down connection failed under uplift forces, allowing one side of the new cable-stayed bridge deck to riseNo injuries occurred, but closure severed the only continuous highway route across northern Canada until temporary repairs were completed.
March 31, 2016Vivekananda Road flyover, Kolkata, IndiaA partially completed steel-and-concrete flyover collapsed during construction amid design, fabrication, and execution failuresTwenty-six people were killed and dozens injured.
March 30, 2017Interstate 85 overpass, Atlanta, GeorgiaCombustible construction materials stored beneath the bridge caught fire, heating the steel until a 92-foot span collapsedNo one was injured, but the failure caused major regional traffic disruption.
January 15, 2018Chirajara Bridge, ColombiaA design error left a critical crossbeam in one of the bridge’s tall concrete piers with insufficient capacity during constructionThe pier and adjoining deck collapsed, killing nine workers.
March 15, 2018FIU pedestrian bridge, Miami, FloridaCalculation errors left a critical nodal region unable to carry its loads; inadequate peer review and the response to severe cracking also contributedThe unfinished span collapsed over traffic, killing six people and injuring ten.
August 14, 2018Ponte Morandi, Genoa, ItalyFailure of a load-bearing stay system followed severe internal corrosion and decades of unresolved deterioration and maintenance concernsA large section of the A10 viaduct collapsed, killing 43 people and forcing demolition of the remaining bridge.
September 4, 2018Majerhat Bridge, Kolkata, IndiaLong-term deterioration and excessive structural demands were among the conditions investigated after a span failedThree people died and 25 were injured.
October 1, 2019Nanfang’ao Bridge, TaiwanCorrosion, inadequate inspection, and insufficient maintenance weakened critical cable componentsThe bridge collapsed onto fishing vessels, killing six people and injuring 12.
October 10, 2019Route 312 overpass, Wuxi, ChinaAn illegally overloaded truck created extreme eccentric loading on the elevated roadwayA large section overturned, killing three people and injuring two.
September 15, 2020Pensacola Bay Bridge, FloridaAn unsecured construction barge driven by Hurricane Sally struck the bridgeA section collapsed into the bay. No deaths were reported, but the crossing remained closed for months.
Collapsed I-35W Mississippi River Bridge over the river in Minneapolis.
The I-35W investigation identified undersized gusset plates and the effects of accumulated and construction loads.

Modern investigations made it easier to separate an immediate trigger from the conditions that allowed it to become catastrophic. Digital records, inspection histories, material testing, and reconstruction of construction sequences revealed recurring combinations of design error, weak temporary works, deterioration, overload, impact, fire, flooding, and delayed action. The period also confirmed that unfinished bridges and rehabilitation projects require the same level of engineering review as completed structures.

These investigations also became more precise about uncertainty. Investigators could distinguish a failed component from the organizational decisions that left it vulnerable, compare computer models with physical evidence, and reconstruct the order in which members lost capacity. That broader approach made bridge failure analysis less focused on identifying a single broken part and more focused on understanding the complete system, including design assumptions, construction records, inspections, maintenance decisions, traffic control, and emergency response.

Bridge Failures from 2021 to the Present

Updated through July 9, 2026. Recent cases may remain under investigation, and the causes listed below distinguish confirmed findings from preliminary explanations. This selection emphasizes fatal collapses, major transportation disruptions, official investigations, and failures involving floods, impacts, deterioration, construction, or extreme weather.

DateBridge and LocationPrimary CauseDeaths and Significance
May 3, 2021Mexico City Metro Line 12 overpass, MexicoAn elevated steel-concrete section failed beneath a passing train. Technical reviews identified construction deficiencies and broader design and maintenance concernsTwenty-six people were killed and 103 injured. The collapse led to reconstruction and reinforcement of the elevated line.
July 15, 2021Georgia Route 86 overpass above I-16, GeorgiaA raised dump trailer struck the bridge and shifted the deck approximately 6 feetNo one was injured, but both directions of I-16 closed while the damaged overpass was demolished, creating a major regional detour.
January 28, 2022Fern Hollow Bridge, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaThe NTSB found that corrosion and section loss caused a fracture-critical tie plate on one bridge leg to fail after repeated maintenance recommendations were not completedThe bridge fell into Frick Park with several vehicles and a transit bus on it. Four people were injured.
August 15, 2022Tretten Bridge, NorwayInvestigators concluded that block-shear failure most likely began in a glued-laminated timber diagonal and overloaded other truss membersThe 10-year-old bridge collapsed across a river and the E6 highway. The two vehicle occupants survived.
September 28, 2022Sanibel Causeway, FloridaHurricane Ian’s storm surge washed away roadway approaches and damaged causeway spansThe only road connection to Sanibel Island became impassable, severely affecting emergency response and recovery access.
October 30, 2022Morbi suspension bridge, Gujarat, IndiaThe pedestrian bridge collapsed four days after reopening following repair work; responsibility for renovation, approval, crowding, and operation became central to the investigation and court proceedingsThe disaster killed 135 people, making it one of the deadliest bridge failures of the century.
June 11, 2023I-95 overpass, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaA gasoline tanker crashed and burned beneath the highway, weakening the supporting steel until the northbound span collapsedThe truck driver died. Closure of a major East Coast freight and commuter route prompted an accelerated temporary reconstruction.
August 14, 2023Randklev railway bridge, NorwayFlooding undermined a river pier and removed its foundation supportThe bridge collapsed without casualties, interrupting an important rail corridor after extreme rainfall.
August 23, 2023Railway bridge under construction near Sairang, Mizoram, IndiaA steel bridge segment and erection equipment failed during construction; the detailed sequence was investigated by authoritiesTwenty-six workers were killed.
February 22, 2024Lixinsha Bridge, Guangzhou, ChinaAn empty container barge struck a bridge pierPart of the roadway collapsed, killing five people and injuring three.
March 26, 2024Francis Scott Key Bridge, Baltimore, MarylandThe NTSB determined that a loose electrical connection caused a blackout aboard the containership Dali, resulting in loss of propulsion and steering before impact. The bridge’s vulnerability to vessel collision and the absence of effective worker evacuation warnings contributed to the outcomeThe main span collapsed and six highway workers were killed. Port and highway access were severely disrupted.
July 19, 2024Highway bridge near Shangluo, Shaanxi, ChinaFlash flooding and debris caused a section of the bridge to failAt least 38 people were confirmed dead and 24 remained missing in later reporting.
September 9, 2024Phong Châu Bridge, Phú Thọ Province, VietnamFlooding associated with Typhoon Yagi caused part of the truss bridge to collapse into the Red RiverVehicles fell into the river; one death was confirmed and several people remained missing during recovery operations.
September 11, 2024Carola Bridge, Dresden, GermanyInvestigators linked the partial collapse to severe corrosion-related damage and fatigue in prestressing steelNo one was injured, but the loss of a major road and light-rail crossing disrupted traffic throughout central Dresden.
December 22, 2024Juscelino Kubitschek de Oliveira Bridge, BrazilThe central section of the aging highway bridge failed while vehicles were crossing; the exact initiating cause remained under investigationThirteen people were confirmed dead and four remained missing. Hazardous-material trucks in the river complicated recovery.
February 27, 2025Cabagan–Santa Maria Bridge, Isabela, PhilippinesA span failed beneath a heavily loaded truck shortly after the bridge entered regular service. Officials cited design deficiencies and overloading, while the designer disputed aspects of that conclusionSix people were injured and the new crossing was closed.
June 15, 2025Kundmala pedestrian bridge, Maharashtra, IndiaThe narrow bridge failed while crowded with visitors and motorcycles; authorities investigated its condition, loading, and maintenance historyFour people were killed and more than 50 injured.
July 9, 2025Gambhira Bridge, Gujarat, IndiaA roadway span failed during morning traffic. Maintenance and structural condition were investigated, but a final technical cause had not been established in the initial reportingTwenty-two people ultimately died, and the disaster triggered inspections of bridges across Gujarat.
February 2, 2026Bridge under construction in Yancheng, Jiangsu, ChinaPart of the unfinished bridge collapsed; the cause remained under investigationAt least two workers were confirmed dead and three were reported missing during the rescue operation.
Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse aftermath beside a container ship in Baltimore.
The Key Bridge collapse renewed attention to vessel-strike vulnerability, pier protection, and emergency warning systems.

These recent failures continue to show how sudden events interact with long-developing vulnerabilities. Because several investigations remain open or have evolved as new evidence emerged, preliminary explanations should not be treated as final findings.

The consequences also extend beyond the structure itself. Closure of a major bridge can interrupt port access, isolate communities, redirect freight traffic, delay emergency services, and require temporary crossings or accelerated reconstruction. For recent incidents, the scale of that disruption is part of their historical significance even when the number of casualties is comparatively low.

Bridge Disasters in Fiction

Bridge collapses have also played a recurring role in fiction, where they often symbolize war, fate, sacrifice, or the failure of human control. In Thornton Wilder’s novel The Bridge of San Luis Rey, the collapse of a rope bridge in Peru becomes the starting point for an inquiry into destiny and the lives of the victims.

In The Bridge on the River Kwai, the destruction of a railway bridge represents both military strategy and the moral conflict created by wartime duty. Silent-era film The General includes one of cinema’s best-known bridge-collapse scenes, in which a locomotive crosses a burning structure and falls into the river. A similar wartime spectacle appears in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, where rival characters destroy a bridge to disrupt the fighting around them.

Unlike real bridge failures, these fictional disasters are designed primarily to advance the plot or reinforce a theme rather than document engineering causes.

Deadliest Bridge Failures in U.S. History

Fatality rankings depend on how a “bridge failure” is defined. Some lists include only permanent highway and railroad bridges, while others include construction failures, elevated roadways, interior pedestrian structures, or transportation disasters initiated by a damaged bridge. The table below compares ten widely cited modern U.S. incidents without repeating the full descriptions already provided in the chronology.

RankBridge or StructureYearDeathsFailure Category
1Hyatt Regency walkways
Kansas City, Missouri
1981114Connection design failure; suspended interior walkways
2Big Bayou Canot railroad bridge
Near Mobile, Alabama
199347Vessel impact and train derailment
3Silver Bridge
West Virginia–Ohio
196746Fracture of a nonredundant member
4Cypress Street Viaduct
Oakland, California
198942Earthquake
5Sunshine Skyway Bridge
Tampa Bay, Florida
198035Vessel impact
6I-40 Bridge at Webbers Falls
Oklahoma
200214Vessel impact
7Cline Avenue bridge ramp
East Chicago, Indiana
198214Construction falsework failure
8I-35W Mississippi River Bridge
Minneapolis, Minnesota
200713Design error and construction loading
9Schoharie Creek Bridge
Near Amsterdam, New York
198710Scour and foundation failure
10Sidney Lanier Bridge
Brunswick, Georgia
197210Vessel impact

The Hyatt Regency entry requires an important qualification: the failed structures were suspended walkways inside a hotel atrium, not a highway, railroad, or river bridge. It remains in this comparison because it is commonly included in U.S. bridge-collapse rankings and became a landmark case in connection design and engineering responsibility.

The ranking shows no single dominant mechanism. Design and construction failures account for several events, while external hazards include earthquakes, scour, and four vessel-related disasters. The concentration of marine impacts also shows why fatality totals depend not only on whether a bridge can resist damage, but on whether traffic can be stopped before vehicles reach a missing span.

Fatality totals should also be interpreted in context. A heavily traveled bridge may expose hundreds of people within minutes, while a similar structural failure during a closure may cause no deaths. Time of day, traffic density, the speed of collapse, weather, visibility, access for rescuers, and the presence of buses or trains can all affect the outcome. For that reason, the deadliest incident is not necessarily the one with the greatest engineering influence or the largest economic impact.

Older U.S. disasters can produce different rankings because historical records do not always distinguish between deaths caused by the bridge collapse, a subsequent fire, drowning, or a train derailment. Limiting this comparison to widely documented modern events provides more consistent figures, but it should not be read as a complete ranking of every bridge-related disaster in U.S. history.

Common Causes of Bridge Failures

Bridge failures rarely result from one isolated problem. A vulnerable detail may remain in service for years before an unusual load, flood, impact, or construction operation triggers collapse. Investigators therefore distinguish the immediate event from underlying weaknesses in design, materials, construction, deterioration, or site conditions.

Many failures are best understood as a chain. A design detail may concentrate stress, corrosion may reduce the remaining section, an inspection may miss the damage, and an overload or storm may supply the final demand. Breaking any one link can prevent collapse, which is why investigators examine both the physical mechanism and the conditions that allowed it to develop.

Technical illustration showing design errors, corrosion, overloading, vessel impacts, and scour as causes of bridge failure.
Bridge failures often involve interacting design, material, maintenance, impact, and environmental hazards.

Design and Engineering Errors

Design errors occur when calculations, assumptions, details, or load paths do not provide the required capacity. Engineers may underestimate forces, overlook a critical connection, specify an undersized component, or fail to account for loads introduced during construction, rehabilitation, or future use. Complex structural behavior can also be simplified too aggressively, leaving local stresses or instability unrecognized.

A lack of structural redundancy can magnify these errors. Redundancy provides alternate load paths so that forces can be redistributed after one component is damaged. In a nonredundant system, fracture of a single critical member may initiate a rapid progressive collapse.

Construction and Material Defects

A sound design can still fail when construction does not match the plans or materials do not perform as specified. Common problems include weak concrete, brittle or defective steel, poor welding, misplaced reinforcement, inadequate bolts, incorrectly assembled connections, and unauthorized field changes. Each defect can reduce capacity or change how forces move through the structure.

Construction sequence is another major risk. Falsework, formwork, lifting systems, scaffolding, and partially completed spans must carry workers, equipment, and fresh concrete before the permanent load path exists. A bridge that is stable when complete may be vulnerable during erection, launching, demolition, or rehabilitation.

Deterioration, Corrosion, and Inadequate Maintenance

Bridges lose capacity as water, deicing salts, marine exposure, temperature cycles, and repeated traffic loads damage their components. Corrosion removes metal from steel members, a process known as section loss. Fatigue creates and enlarges cracks through repeated stress cycles, even when individual vehicle loads remain below the bridge’s original design capacity.

Concrete can crack, delaminate, or lose protection around reinforcing steel. Bearings may seize, joints may leak, cables may corrode internally, and timber or masonry foundations may deteriorate below the waterline. When repairs are delayed, several moderate defects can combine until a member, connection, or foundation can no longer carry its load.

Overloading, Vehicle Strikes, and Vessel Collisions

Traffic can exceed a bridge’s capacity through illegally heavy trucks, concentrated construction materials, unexpected crowd loads, or vehicle patterns that differ from the original design assumptions. Oversized vehicles may strike overhead truss members or girders, while a derailed train can damage a support or bring another structure down onto the tracks.

Barges and oceangoing ships can remove a pier or displace a movable span within seconds. The severity of a vessel collision depends on ship mass and speed, channel geometry, pier location, protective structures, and whether the bridge can remain standing after a support is lost.

Flooding, Scour, Earthquakes, and Extreme Weather

Scour is the erosion of riverbed material around a pier or abutment. Because it occurs underwater, a foundation may lose support while the visible bridge appears intact. Floodwater can also carry debris, increase hydraulic forces, wash away approach embankments, and redirect a river toward foundations that were not designed for the new flow.

Earthquakes can overload columns, bearings, joints, and connections within seconds, particularly in older bridges built before modern seismic standards. Strong winds may cause excessive vibration or aerodynamic instability in flexible spans. Hurricanes, storm surge, ice, landslides, wildfire debris, and extreme heat can act alone or combine with existing deterioration to produce failure.

How Bridge Failures Changed Design, Inspection, and Safety

Historical bridge failures remain relevant because investigations convert individual disasters into engineering knowledge. In the United States, major collapses have repeatedly changed design assumptions, inspection priorities, training, accountability, and protection against hazards that earlier standards did not fully address.

The most durable improvements operate across a bridge’s full life cycle. They begin with site selection and design, continue through fabrication and construction, and remain necessary during inspection, rehabilitation, emergency planning, and eventual replacement. A lesson learned at one bridge is most valuable when owners apply it systematically to other structures with similar materials, details, exposure, or operating conditions.

Engineers using bridge inspection, testing, pier protection, and traffic warning systems.
Modern bridge safety combines structural redundancy, specialized inspections, load evaluation, pier protection, and rapid warnings.

Structural Redundancy and Independent Design Review

Failures involving critical members showed that designers must consider what happens after a component fractures, not only whether every component satisfies its normal design load. Modern practice gives greater attention to alternate load paths, resistance to progressive collapse, and the identification of nonredundant steel tension members whose failure could threaten an entire span.

Independent review has also become more important for unusual, complex, or rapidly constructed bridges. An effective review verifies calculations, connections, load paths, construction stages, and assumptions rather than simply checking that drawings are complete. It must also cover design revisions and field changes that may alter the forces carried by a member or connection.

Inspection Programs, Load Ratings, and Testing

The National Bridge Inspection Standards establish nationwide requirements for inspecting and evaluating highway bridges on public roads. Routine visual inspections remain essential, but underwater foundations, fatigue-prone details, nonredundant members, complex bridges, and components with known deterioration may require specialized methods or shorter inspection intervals.

A load rating estimates how much weight an existing bridge can safely carry in its present condition. It must reflect deterioration, repairs, added pavement, changes in traffic, and the current behavior of critical members. When capacity is insufficient, owners may need to post weight limits, restrict traffic, repair the bridge, or close it.

Nondestructive testing complements visual inspection by detecting defects without damaging the component. Depending on the material and suspected problem, inspectors may use ultrasonic, magnetic-particle, radiographic, acoustic, or other methods to identify cracks, weld defects, corrosion, and hidden section loss.

Government Oversight, Training, and Accountability

Bridge safety is shared among owners, state transportation departments, federal agencies, designers, contractors, inspectors, and maintenance personnel. Owners must preserve accurate records, respond to critical findings, update load ratings, enforce restrictions, and complete repairs before deterioration reaches an unsafe level. Oversight agencies establish standards, audit compliance, publish guidance, and act when investigations reveal a recurring national risk.

Training must keep pace with new materials, inspection technologies, and lessons from failures. Inspectors need enough bridge-specific knowledge to recognize critical components and understand how localized damage can affect the full load path. Designers and contractors must account for temporary conditions, rehabilitation loads, and construction changes. Clear documentation and assigned responsibility are essential when a safety concern requires escalation.

Vessel-Strike Protection and Emergency Warning Systems

Bridges over navigable waterways require site-specific evaluation of vessel size, traffic frequency, channel geometry, currents, wind, visibility, pier location, and the consequences of losing a support. Risk reduction may include dolphins, fender systems, reinforced piers, channel modifications, navigation controls, or replacement of a vulnerable structure.

Physical protection is only one layer of defense. Detection and communication systems can identify an errant vessel or sudden bridge movement, close traffic, warn motorists, and direct workers to evacuate. The Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse renewed U.S. attention to vulnerability assessments and the need to coordinate bridge owners, marine operators, emergency services, and highway agencies before an impact occurs.

The lasting lesson of bridge failures is that safety is a continuous process: design for credible hazards, verify critical calculations, inspect the components most likely to control collapse, act on deterioration, and update standards when evidence exposes a weakness. Each investigation adds to that evidence and helps prevent the same combination of errors from recurring.

Related Entries:

Subir

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience while browsing. Read more...